As I’ve been following Congress’ investigation into steroid use in Major League Baseball, I’ve thought up a few questions:
Does anyone think this will turn out well? How much money will Jose Canseco make from selling his tell-all steroids book? How many more baseball stars I’ve admired growing up will be added to my list of disappointments? Will MLB take away Mark McGwire’s homerun record?
And I thought the baseball strike in 1994 was bad for the game. Yikes!
Anyway, today baseball players and owners decided to drop fines for steroid use, opting for a suspension only policy — AP: Baseball Agrees to Drop Steroid Fines:
Members of Congress repeatedly pummeled baseball officials for the fine possibility during Thursday’s hearing before the House Government Reform Committee. Management told the committee it was willing to eliminate the fine provision, held over from baseball’s first drug-testing agreement in 2002, but union head Donald Fehr said he would have to consult with players.
“We do have an agreement with Don that the language after the disjunctive in the various disciplinary levels is going to be eliminated,” Rob Manfred, baseball’s executive vice president for labor relations, said Sunday. “It will be just the straight suspension, which everybody knew was going to happen anyway. To the degree there was any doubt, I think this change should put to rest any concerns in that regard.” […]
Commissioner Bud Selig repeatedly said during the hearing that his intent was to suspend players for all positive tests.
Okay, so removing the possibilities of fines is helping baseball’s image? I don’t get it. Wouldn’t that show a weaker front against steroid use than fines plus suspensions?
And why did Congress pressure baseball to drop the fines? Were they worried that suspensions would be considered optional?
In case you’re confused, get ready to get no clarification whatsoever from Rep. Christopher Shays of Connecticut, who just adds more confusion to the process:
Commissioner Bud Selig repeatedly said during the hearing that his intent was to suspend players for all positive tests. Baseball officials also referred to the provision as a drafting error; they said Sunday that the language would be eliminated.
“That’s backpedaling. I think they came before the committee and did not tell us the truth,” Shays said in a telephone interview. “They are certainly conflicted about what they are saying to us. They said fines are not part of the agreement; now they say they’re going to take out the fines.”
Thanks so much for clarifying that, Congressman Shays. Geez. So, okay, at least we know Congress wanted to make sure baseball automatically suspended players who test positive for steroids.
Instead of investigating possible past steroid use, why doesn’t baseball just ensure regular drug testing and suspend players who test positive for steroids? Sometimes the simple solution is the right one.
RELATED: Bonds may miss entire baseball season